Page 234 - kdk-sempozyum-3
P. 234

this  again  yesterday.  Both  of  those  reports  were  about  schemes  to
               provide grants to people with restricted mobility, people with some
               form of physical disability so that they could access motor transport.
               Both  of  these  schemes  had  a  cutoff  date  of  65.  Emily  concluded
               properly  that  the  schemes  discriminated  against  older  people.  The
               government though didn’t implement her recommendations because
               of the cost of extending the schemes to include older people and in fact
               what actually happened because they accepted that the schemes were
               discriminatory was that they withdrew them and no one had access.
               But in that instance by then a new government had come in to office
               and it decided that the ombudsman’s reports should go to a special
               committee of the parliament whose job was to hold government to
               account  for  not  implementing  any  of  the  recommendations  of  the
               ombudsman’s  reports.  So,  now  in  those  instances  where  ministers
               refuse  to  implement  recommendations  they  are  called  before  a
               committee of the parliament to account for their actions. It doesn’t
               guarantee in the end parliamentary democracy has the authority for if
               it chooses not to implement the recommendations of the ombudsman
               but  it  does  mean  it  can  no  longer  be  done  without  parliamentary
               scrutiny and the very high levels of public scrutiny that go with that.
               So, to an extent I suppose where it does leaves us, what it means is
               that in Ireland almost every recommendation of the ombudsman is
               implemented. There is only one really outstanding recommendation
               and that remains to be I think it is one of those that probably never be
               resolved that was the Lost at Sea scheme. But as a consequence of that
               we now have a mechanism which enables the ombudsman to have
               access to a parliamentary committee, if I want to discuss any item with
               them I can call a chair of that committee and arrange a meeting. And
               so we have an effective mechanism for holding government and public
               service to account and it is a model which is seen in other democracies
               and I think can be very effective in making sure that the ombudsman’s
               recommendations are implemented. Thank you.


               CHAIR: This is turning out to be an extraordinarily good session because
               we  have  had  two  presentations  well  within  the  amount  of  time  and  I
               am very grateful to Peter Tyndall for so doing. Let me again offer some
               reflections on this issue. The issue of the relationship of ombudsman with
               parliament of course is critical to the authority of the ombudsman and


                  rd
          232        |  3  INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS
   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239