Page 240 - kdk-sempozyum-3
P. 240

My  area  of  specialization  is  Ombudsman  and  relations  with  public
               administration.  I  would  like  to  underline  two  dimensions  here.  To
               do that, I will point at a terminology issue. Though Ombudsman of
               Turkey is called `public sector auditing`, no term of auditing is used
               in the legislation. Though it derived from the term of `auditing`, this
               organization  prefers  to  use  the  term  of  Ombudsman  and  both  on
               its website and many publications, this organization is called as the
               Ombudsman Institution.

               For  example,  in  our  constitution,  actions  to  be  taken  a  public
               organization  are  regulated  by  law  and  `review`  is  used  as  a  tool
               with this end. In law, there is a mission of investigation, review and
               generation of recommendations.
               Hence,  departing  from  this  status  of  the  legislation  in  the  country,
               I would like to point at something. Nonetheless, is it the right thing
               to  define  the  relations  between  the  public  administration  and  the
               ombudsman, denoting tension? I would like to refer to the fact that
               the countries that started Ombudsman institutions earlier than other
               countries, there is no fierce debate on auditing shortcoming.
               I will present the dimensions of this relationship by quoting examples
               from the recommendations by the Ombudsman of Turkey.
               Let  me  introduce  my  personal  impressions  and  would  like  to  hear
               your  evaluation,  too.  I  would  like  to  express  that  the  relationship
               between the public sector organizations and the ombudsman is not
               posited upon `the auditor` and `the audited`. Rather than auditing,
               it is preventing public administrations or organizations from ill-doings,
               wrong  actions,  ill-treatment  and  behavior,  helping  them  to  identify
               problems and enabling them to eliminate their mistakes. Likewise, we
               can explain the reason behind the suspension of the duration to file
               a lawsuit.

               Technically,  it  should  be  interpreted  within  the  framework  of
               suspension generated by a relationship on auditing. For this reason, I
               would like to highlight two dimensions for a better evaluation.
               First of all, the phenomenon of Ombudsman is a means to contribute
               in  contribution  with  the  public  sector  to  the  making,  change  and
               development of administrative law. Administrative law has evolved so
               far with the contributions of the judgements and provided uniqueness


                  rd
          238        |  3  INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245