Page 264 - kdk-sempozyum-3
P. 264

CHAIR:  Let  I  just  add  very  briefly,  this  is  very  important  that  you’ve
               raised  and  Peter  said  in  well-functioning  democracy,  this  is  a  critical
               dimension  which  has  to  do  of  course  with  the  balance  of  rule  of  law
               in  democracy  that  we  are  talking  about.  My  views  to  tell  you  looking
               at comparatively that going down the road having binding decisions is
               a road primarily because the chief and fundamental distinction of an
               ombudsman from a court is precisely that the court has the power to
               issue binding decisions.

               If the ombudsman were to become empowered to issue binding decisions
               it would be very difficult to be able to distinguish between an ombudsman
               and a court. It is not in the interest of an ombudsman to get into potential
               confiscatory  situation  of  a  court  because  the  courts  are  the  ultimate
               foundations  of  the  rule  of  the  law.  And  what  happens  if  you  have  the
               court saying one thing with a binding decision and the ombudsman saying
               another thing with a binding decision? Then you get into very serious hot
               water. So, I think in principle for us but also for the reasons of rule of
               law and of constitutional balance avoiding granting the power of binding
               decisions to ombudsman is I think the soundest way of approaching it.
               From then on of course the legal jurisdiction has its own freedom to move.
               Thank you.
               Now,  gentleman  in  the  back  who  wanted  to  ask  a  question,  maybe  I
               discourage d him or disappointed him and he left. Anyone else? Yes, sir?
               Go ahead.


          PRESENTER- Thank you.

               CHAIR:  Sorry  for  the  technical  difficulty,  please  if  you  can  repeat  your
               question so that we can interpret.

          OMBUDSMAN of ROMANIA – This is a very sensitive topic because we lay our
               foundation on the independency because you know that we cannot
               intervene justice and I am talking about the experiences of my country
               this intervention goes beyond the limits. And if there are critical issues
               and if these issues go to justice than we are intervening justice now I
               would like to raise my question in such topics, the independency of
               justice, are we affecting independence or not? Thank you.




                  rd
          262        |  3  INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269